I've noticed that AI deletes certain words from the premise, arguments, in debates. I see words like "demonic," "" and others are routinely deleted or prohibited...how can one argue or rebut or state a premise when words are deleted without cause...these words are not vulgar or unseemly? I have left this debate forum before due the censorship (with great joy to the attending atheists and communists on the site)...I reentered hoping the program had been corrected, apparently not. Now my debate premise' are deleted awaiting approval...where do these debates go, will they ever be posted?
@aarong
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Leave DebateIsland.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The good thing is it's ai. I've realized changing a phrase or substituting words that get the same points across usually works. Also right before you post copy what you're going to say with your mouse. Sometimes going in and out of the site resets the ai and allows you post what you want to say. Lastly, use the copy icon when responding to someone instead of cut and pasting. The ai seems to like that better.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Number 1: I'm a believer in the First Amendment, absolutely.
First Amendment
Jack, you really need to highlight what part gives you free speech. The first part of the self-evident truth is that Congress cannot make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the exercise thereof a religion without cost. This is to confirm the Declaration of Independence which states it is the act of men, and now women. What part takes away or limits the way we take and write when describing grievance is where I pointed out and highlighted. We cannot shorten a word to change the meaning. The 1st Amendment protects the exercise of a religion that is held without cost.
i'm not saying there are no United States Constitutional Rights written in the ratifide Sections inside the American Constitution for we the people speack, write, and other forms of expression of filed grivance
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Contributes is a word that is commonly abridged by many people at liberty. This means they are self-governing. It should also be noted that the Declaration of Independence describes all forms of Government derived by the people. So, the 1st and 2nd Amendment are written for the people as is all the Bill of Rights.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
It never ceases to amaze me how leftists have such selective memories. It was not long ago that leftstists banned 4 Dr Suess books for content they deemed insensitive. Leftists sought to ban books such as Huckleberry Finn and To Kill a Mockingbird because of its use of the N word. Last year leftists tried to ban books by Kirk Cameron and even tried to not allow him to read his children's book at public libraries. Books by conservative authors like Ben Shapiro have been banned by leftist outlets and universities.
Parents who don't want sexually explicit books in public grade schools are not evil like leftists are, Jack. The most commonly sought to ban book, Gender Queer, has images of underage characters performing blow jobs and having anal sex. Further, there is an image of a naked adult male holding the 'manhood' of a naked underage boy who is not yet a man. What message is that sending do you think?
Now Jack, it seems to me that you are more than a little hypocritical on this issue.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Which is a bit rich coming from some one who habitually quotes from spam web sites and posts articles that have been doctored by AI sites that close down and re surface on another site. There’s no accounting for dishonesty is there?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Jack, again, I think your side loses the debate if the images and descriptions that parents find objectionable are made known to people publicly - unfortunately news websites can't show the images because it violates their policy on child sexual exploitive images. That alone should tell you something. I get you have taken a libertarian position. I tend to be very libertarian in my views. But when I see images of naked men holding the 'manhood' of naked boys and the text of the book describes this in a positive light, I think that someone is pushing an agenda on children that is pro-pedophile. I don't think that's appropriate.
Now, if you finally published your book on the things you found in your prison wallet, I wouldn't personally read it, but as long as it is not targeted to children, I'd support your right to have it out there. I hold that position, not because I would agree with the choices you've made about the things you've placed in your prison wallet, but because I want to have the right to have messages I support disseminated in the public domain too. However, I think there should be screening of resources available to minors. You would support people with a pro-pedophile agenda having access to minors in public schools and sharing sexually explicit images. On that we disagree.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I have attempted twice to respond but AI will not permit it...I am censored.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
While I don't consume pedophile material myself, in a FREE country, I support a persons right to CONSUME it if he so chooses..
So, the principle you are trying to hold without cost to the people as a United State is a liberty of choice. Then the very 1st thing you say as a witness however is the choice does not have a United State with you. America is free due to the separation from British law, we have criminal law and we have United States Constitutional Right which can be held equal to criminal law.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Bogie, isn't an enemy of mine, but I'm not sure he would not appreciate being called my cohort. We agree on some things, and disagree on others. Like I'm sure I agree some with you, but not on pedophilia, and disagree on other things.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra